Dan -

The accident rate due to medical issues is less than 1/2 of 1 percent.
Almost to the place of being statistically zero.

Yet, the FAA has made another step toward an enlightened view with the sport
pilot rule.

However, it would be nice to have Mike's privileges in the U.K. - I do wish
I could still fly something in the U.S. a bit more capable, like even a
Piper Archer or Grumman Tiger.

Jerry E.
  -----Original Message-----
  From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Dan Caliendo
  Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 6:20 PM
  To: ercoupe tech
  Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] Re: Proposed rule changes ie is it a C or a D


  Almost all of the aviation accidents in the U.S. happen to a pilot who
holds a valid medical

  Dan C




  On Apr 20, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Jerry Eichenberger wrote:




    Mike -
    That's great news about the rule change in the U.K. Can you fly IFR
without a medical?
    I probably won't live long enough to see it here in the U.S., but I hope
that someday the class 3 medical is totally eliminated for pilots who are
not flying for hire.
    In the U.S. glider pilots have never had to have a medical, and the
accident rate for medical incapacitation accidents is the same for glider
and powered aircraft pilots. And many power pilots who have lost their
medicals revert to glider flying to stay aloft in at least something. So you
can make a valid argument that theirs is a less fit sample of pilots. Still,
no increase in medical related accidents.
    Jerry E.
      -----Original Message-----
      From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Willis
      Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 5:14 PM
      To: [email protected]
      Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] Re: Proposed rule changes ie is it a C or
a D




      Very fortunately for me and many others, we have a 'non-medical'
license in the UK. The NPPL (National Private Pilots Licence) was brought in
a few years ago and does not require a medical, just a valid drivers
licence. In fact due to my medical history I can only get a 3 year drivers
licence before I have to reapply and have my application supported by my
doctor. But I can still fly!
      Compared to a 'normal' JAA PPL I am restricted to daytime VFR, and can
only fly outside the UK with written permission from that country
(reciprocal arrangements are not in place yet). Very sensibly the CAA (our
equivalent of the FAA) did not impose any weight restriction so I can
legally fly any type I would otherwise have been able to fly.
      As well as allowing many people like myself to start flying, the
scheme has also allowed many veteran pilots to stay in the air. I may be
wrong, but I believe there have been no increase in accident rates etc.
since the NPPL scheme was introduced.
      Mike
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: Jerry Eichenberger
        To: John Cooper ; [email protected]
        Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:09 PM
        Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] Re: Proposed rule changes ie is it a C
or a D


        I agree with John Cooper.
        The sport pilot rule is the best thing since sliced bread. Let's not
screw with it, and open up cans of worms, when the comments affect only a
tiny minority of those exercising sport pilot privileges.
        I'm just thankful we have an enlightened FAA (and I mean that) who
allowed guys like me to continue flying.
        Sure, we all could have written it differently, but remember that
virtually everywhere else in the world, even glider pilots have to have
medicals, and medicals with far stricter standards than our 3rd class. I
know of no other country that allows real, powered airplanes to be flown
without a medical - not even Canada.
        Be thankful for what we've got - it's good.
        Jerry E.
          -----Original Message-----
          From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Cooper
          Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 10:47 AM
          To: [email protected]
          Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] Re: Proposed rule changes ie is it a C
or a D


          >>Would this even effect any other certificated aircraft but the
Ercoupe? If
          so maybe it would be a small enough change that they would go for
it.<<

          I know for a fact that there are Luscombes that would be affected.
Also
          probably some Taylorcrafts. Maybe others, but I don't know.

          I think you want to stress meeting the type certificate as the
criteria, and
          avoid discussions around planes that have been converted
incorrectly. The
          latter would open a huge can of worms that is best avoided, IMHO.

          John Cooper
          Skyport Services
          4996 Delaware Tnpk
          Rensselaerville, NY 12147
          518 797-3064
          www.skyportservices.net










  

Reply via email to