Harmut
You are correct. That's yet one more example of the imbecility of government 
bureaucracies. Illogical regulations that make no sense whatsoever. Imagine 
when government starts controlling health care ! 
Eliacim


 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Hartmut Beil 
  To: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; Techlist Ercoupe 
  Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:07 PM
  Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] Model C or D


    The interesting point is that When you converted a 415/C to a 415/D for the 
higher gross weight, you would do exactly the same things for the conversion as 
you will do when using the new 1320 lb gross weight STC.
   
  So you can end up with 2 identical aircraft, one you can legally fly as Sport 
Pilot, the other not.
  Only one letter in the registration makes the difference.
   
  And even a 415-E does not differ from a 415 C/D when the latter has the split 
elevator installed. And yet one you can fly as a Sport Pilot, the other not.
  The planes are aerodynamically and structurally the same.
   
  Just a small difference in the registration...
   
  That is really too much bureaucracy to me..
   
   
  Hartmut
   
   
   
   



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  To: [email protected]; [email protected]
  From: [email protected]
  Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:52:37 -0500
  Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] Model C or D

    
  Yes, it would appear that without the proper registration change, the bird 
was merely a Model C being flown outside its weight and balance limits as if it 
were a model D.  It remained a Model C.


  (You can bet that is how the FAA would have treated it, should the pilot have 
been ramp checked.)

  Dave W 



  From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Bill BIGGS
  Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:14 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] Model C or D



   

  My coupe was registered as a 415D and also had a weight and ballance of a 
415D. \
   
  Anyone can prepare a weight and ballance.
   
  That is why I contacted the FAA.
   
  As my letter showed, the FAA still considers it a 415C based on the 
airworthiness certificate.
   
  I think the reqirements allowed on TCDS-787 are the modifications that are 
required, there is and was still a requirement to file and get approved form 
8130-6 
   
  I believe that if someone has a Coupe that was converted to a 415D but still 
has a 415C or 415CD airworthiness certificate, it was never "legally" operated 
as a 415D.
   
  I believe there is a good case to present to the FAA.
   
  Bill
   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  To: [email protected]; [email protected]
  From: [email protected]
  Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:21:26 -0700
  Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] Model C or D

    

        What changes a C to a D ? Thanks also for the computer advice guys. Nick

        --- On Thu, 7/23/09, G. Davis <[email protected]> wrote:


        From: G. Davis <[email protected]>
        Subject: [ercoupe-tech] Model C or D
        To: "ercoupe list" <[email protected]>
        Date: Thursday, July 23, 2009, 1:07 AM



              I am no expert, but it is my understanding if the plane has ever 
been converted to a D model, it can NEVER qualify for LSA. I know this by 
experience, since I almost bought a D model that still was registered by the 
FAA as a 415-C. Probably no big deal, unless the 337 ever got filed or noticed 
by the FAA. Even the data plate said it was a C. But, the W&B showed 1400 gross 
wt. *Take care, and buyer beware.
              Gary
             




       






------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Bing™ brings you maps, menus, and reviews organized in one place. Try it now. 






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Search, add, and share the web’s latest sports 
videos. Check it out. 

  

Reply via email to