Going to the actual 'regs' this is the precise language used in FAR 1.1 Definitions for "Light Sport Aircraft"
_____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Burkhead Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 8:14 AM To: 'james ayers'; ety Subject: [ercoupe-tech] down-shift aircraft back to LSA eligibility In regard to LSA eligibility of an aircraft and whether a plane can be converted back to LSA eligibility, James asked: > I haven't been able to locate that exact section of the > regs though - anyone know where it is? That's easy to answer: http://sportpilot. <http://sportpilot.org/learn/sp_rule.pdf> org/learn/sp_rule.pdf The critical part is in definitions of LSA, right at the beginning, and the clearly stated phrase, "Light-sport aircraft means an aircraft, other than a helicopter or powered-lift that, since its original certification, has continued to meet the following:" As the regulators said when the rule came out, this was to prevent 10,000 Experimental Amateur Built aircraft from just putting in paperwork to have their gross weight changed down to become eligible - and then flying just as they always had. The fact that this phrase also picked up Ercoupes which had a special certificated ability to shift downward was accidental and a shame but they weren't going to mess with qualifications in the regulations for a hundred aircraft or so. It'll be worth watching. Please DO let us know if the Aeronca people have continued success with this. Ed Ed Burkhead http://edburkhead. <http://edburkhead.com/Ercoupe/index.htm> com/Ercoupe/index.htm ed -at- edbur???khead.yyy change -at- to @, remove the ??? and change yyy to com _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of james ayers Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 4:53 AM To: Hartmut Beil; Techlist Ercoupe Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] TSO or Not ? This topic is from the Luscombe forum. Rumor that the LSA could be increased. Also interesting about the Aeronca story. thought I'd provide a link to this <http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/regulatory/sport_rule.pdf> DOCUMENT It's 112 pages, triple column and contains just about anything you'd care to know about the Sport Pilot rules, how they were made and what concerns were brought up, how they were addressed and why certain decisions were made. The whole thing went through a lengthy period of public comment and scrutiny and you'll be amazed to find that just about any question or concern you could possibly think of has already been brought up and discussed. I can't say I agree with the decisions made on all counts and especially how the gross weight issues were dealt with (FWIW the original proposal was for 1232 lbs) but I can say that everything we've been discussing here over the past week or two is in there, it's covered. The reason I started digging into this is because I was reading on the National Aeronca Association forum about a guy who has gotten an okay from the FAA to convert an Aeronca 7CCM back to a 7AC and ending up with it being SP legal. According to the logic the idea that the aircraft can never have been certificated for a GW over 1320 lbs is referring to aircraft produced as LSA's - i.e. it doesn't pertain to aircraft that have a type certificate data sheet, such as Aeroncas and Luscombes. So, this will be interesting to watch. I haven't been able to locate that exact section of the regs though - anyone know where it is?
