I'm very interested in how the 7148 will work with my Don's Dream Machines 
C-85/O-200 STC engine.  I'm expecting slightly better cruise speed since the 
engine can put out around 93 HP at the 2575 RPM limit.  Even cruising at 2400 
RPM, I should be putting out more HP than a C-85 at the same RPM, while 2400 is 
the equivalent of 75% economy cruise on the O-200.  But where I really expect 
to see a difference is climb performance.  Not only will the engine be 
producing more torque, but I should be able to climb at a higher RPM than the 
2100-2200 I normally saw with my old C-85.

Even though the 'coupe has a reputation as a "clean" design, I really think our 
big fat wing is what limits the speed potential of the airframe. (That and the 
Vno and Va limits!)

Dave



--- In [email protected], "Donald" <dongen...@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> Where I get lost in all that, is the figures get skewered by available 
> horsepower, drag, and such.  In theory one could get some high number pitch, 
> and cruise 150 mph in a coupe.  I wonder if someone has ever made a chart, 
> listing takeoff distance, climb rate, and top speeds, perhaps on a chart so 
> one could make better choices.
> For instance I am told that I will be quite disappointed with my McCauley 71 
> by 51 on the C85 engine, but I hope it will cruise with the big boys.
> 
> .
> --- In [email protected], "Ed Burkhead" <ed@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > Larry,
> > 
> > I presume you have an O-200 in your Coupe?  The STC for putting the
> > O-200 in Coupes calls for the regular C-150 prop to be used.  (Many
> > installations on LSA eligible 415-C and 415-CD planes used that STC as
> > "accepted data" even though they didn't actually use the STC to
> > authorize the installation.)
> > 
> > On a Coupe, the pitch called for makes it a climb prop with a cruise of
> > only about 108 mph but with quite good climb.  Sorry I can't remember
> > which pitch is called for in the STC.
> > 
> > The first number is the length of the prop.  The second number is how
> > many inches forward the plane would move (with no slippage) on each turn
> > of the prop.  (Slippage usually runs around 5%.  
> > http://edburkhead.com/Ercoupe/enginepropeller_efficiency.htm )
> > 
> > Thus, a pitch of 50" goes forward farther than would a 48."  The flatter
> > 48" is better for the low speeds of a climb so it gives you greater
> > climb.
> > 
> > Ed
> >
>


Reply via email to