Sorry Bill, I am not that familiar here yet, it is stil PH-NCE serial 4765 as 
can be seen on ercoupe.net.
where can I find this Bill Bayne to give him this data? I looked in this forum 
but can't find it myself.

I did send a request to oklahoma, thanks for the idea.

Ruben



--- In [email protected], Bill BIGGS <webacr...@...> wrote:
>
> 
> Changed the posting, see what this drags up.
> 
>  
> 
> You also might check with Oklahoma City aircraft registration. If the plane 
> was ever under US registration there could be a file with the original 
> airworthiness certificate.
> 
>  
> 
> Bill Bayne might have a record of it's original N number. Post the serial 
> number to the list.
> 
>  
> 
> Problem is, lots of Coupers at Oshkosh this week.
> 
>  
> 
> Bill
> Bill 
> 
> 
> To: [email protected]
> From: ruben29...@...
> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:14:24 +0000
> Subject: [ercoupe-tech] Re: Eb\ngine oil, Vacuum pumps et al
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> Hey Bil,
> Thanks, today I talked to my boss who is an IA and an other IA who sometimes 
> works for our company and we figured out the same. Since we wil reregister 
> the plane to US registration, and our DAR is reasonable but strict I wanted 
> to have it right and no questions to be asked. 
> Because the plane has been in The Netherlands,out country, since 1947 it wil 
> be difficult enough cause I don't think the original american registration 
> form is stil there wich, wil be very important so to make it up, the aircraft 
> has to be tip top, and also, that's the way I like to work. Just like to do 
> it as it should be and not cutting corners.
> 
> And just as you are talking about it, do you know someone who might have a 
> 337 for this conversion?
> 
> Thanks for your reply,
> 
> Ruben
> 
> --- In [email protected], Bill BIGGS <webacraft@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > Ruben,
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Technically you are correct, but I think you are misinterpreting the notes. 
> > When it says eligible on C75-12 and 12F I believe that means as apposed to 
> > -8 engines without pads for generator or starter.
> > 
> > 
> > I believe a look at TCDS 787 makes it clear, and does not specify a starter 
> > or generator. It also specifies the additional baffels needed in note 4.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Then again, just because it seems obvious to us, the FAA is the final say.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > That being said, you might want to get a previous 337 on this conversion as 
> > "approved data", or best of all, have your IA send a "before the fact" 337 
> > to your friendly FSDO to review and give preliminary approval before you do 
> > the actual work.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Bill
> > 
> > A&P-IA
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > To: [email protected]
> > From: harrylfrancis@
> > Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:34:59 -0700
> > Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] Re: Eb\ngine oil, Vacuum pumps et al
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > From: ruben29578 <ruben29578@>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Sun, July 25, 2010 4:52:03 PM
> > Subject: [ercoupe-tech] Re: Eb\ngine oil, Vacuum pumps et al
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Ok I know it is an old topic, but I am restoring an Ercoupe and would like 
> > to convert the C75 to a C85, the SB M47-16 does not state anything about 
> > the starter and generator. 
> > The TCDS of the plane tels you the starter and generator are no longer 
> > allowed, i.a.w. note 308 and 107. The TCDS of the plane does, as far as I 
> > can see, not give any replacement P/N for both.
> > The TCDS of the engine states the same starter P/N for both engines. 
> > Also the P/N of the generator is useable on both engines i.a.w. the engine 
> > TCDS although, if I had to change it, I would go for more capacity or 
> > probably an alternator.
> > 
> > I am studying to be an A&P, only have the practical exam to go, but even I 
> > am lost here.
> > 
> > Who can help me out?
> > 
> > Ruben
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "John Cooper" <john@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > Question: If your 415C "under TCDS A-718" is converted to a C-85 is the
> > > starter still legal?
> > > 
> > > Good catch! Read on, and you'll see the generator has to come off also! ;)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > John Cooper
> > > 
> > > Skyport Services
> > > 
> > > 518 797-3064
> > > 
> > > www.skyportservices.net
> > > 
> > > _____ 
> > > 
> > > _
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > HI,
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > The first coupes did not have starters or generatorss, but most all later 
> > models, after 1940 did come equiped with both... Delco units, similar to 
> > auto generators. The earliest Gen were 13 amp, later changed to 25, then 35 
> > amps...all approved for C-75 or 85 and 90 engines.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > With the curent electronics... transistors, etc, I sdee no need for the 
> > change to an alternator --about $1000+, plus sawing off the shaft on the 
> > accessory case to utilize an alternator.... Only advantaagfe I see is the 
> > re-charging of a weak battery at Idle speweed. And as you know, one sdhould 
> > not let an air cooled engine sit lone at idle.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > The Delco units can be rebuilt with standard Delco brushes, etc.... 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > The one change I might consider is the repplacement of the Delco 
> > regulartoer with a solid state device.....BUT, mine is still operational, 
> > works fine still for the time I have owned N93530...since 1982. :)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Have Fun - Fly Safe
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > regards,
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Harry Francis
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________________
> > Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your 
> > inbox.
> > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                                         
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your 
> inbox.
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
>


Reply via email to