I guess I have to respond to this one.. I am one of those people that have been 
landing "Hot".  I have listened to many of you Couper's that claim you land in 
the low 60's or at least below 70mph.  Well, I have had my Coupe for a little 
over two years now and it is a metal wing 1950 G' Model and I can tell you from 
much experience that landing this plane below 75 would result in major repairs. 
 I usually touch down at around 78 to 85mph.  The plane starts to sink at about 
1200 ft per min. if you let it get slower than 75mph.  And that is not what you 
want when you are 20 ft off the ground.  I know all of you guys with the fabric 
wings can land slow - but when you add the weight of metal it is a different 
story.  Jerry - leaving tomorrow for Kitty Hawk from the Great Northwest.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: [email protected] 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:59 AM
  Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] nose gear cable


    

  Who's landing hot?  Notice from time to time, some people screw up the flare 
- initiate it just a tad late - and allow the nose gear to touch first.  The 
upward force of that premature nose gear touch rotates the airplane around it's 
lateral axis and the mains touch with some flying speed and the airplane 
becomes airborne.  The pilot, in an attempt to correct the bounce, 
instinctively applies forward pressure on the yoke forcing another nose wheel 
touch and the sequence repeats except this time with a bigger bounce.  
Subsequent control inputs become a half cycle out of phase the and bounce 
becomes more exaggerated.  That is a true JC maneuver (slang) or 
"pilot-induced-oscillation" (PIO).  You haven't lived until you've been in one 
of those.  I witnessed one in 1961 in a T-33 and we flew out of it.  
  The corrective action, by the way, is to go around immediately.  If you ride 
it out, you are either going to crash or at the least crunch the nose gear and 
firewall.
  Pants on the ground
  Hat turned around
  Bart

  In a message dated 8/18/2010 11:12:40 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

    Just as the choice to smoke or not smoke is one each of us must make, 
    there are good choices and bad choices.  I choose to presume people who 
    wear their caps backward (that aren't welders) don't know any better, 
    and I never vocalize that choice  ;<)

    The presence or absence of a snubber is of little consequence to a 
    reasonably experienced Ercoupe pilot.  A level static sill is MUCH more 
    important.  I do believe it a disadvantage to pilots new to the Ercoupe 
    to have a snubber.

    Any pilot that repeatedly lands an Ercoupe "hot" either does not 
    understand or does not demonstrate the proficiency of control necessary 
    for predictable and safe operation(s).  The remedy is not a ten buck 
    length of aircraft cable.  It is sufficient qualified instruction to 
    thereafter predictably and repeated land an Ercoupe at or below 70 mph 
    TIAS in any weather condition likely to be encountered.

    Presuming proper rigging and a stabilized approach, touchdown at up to 
    90 mph should be uneventful...a "wheel landing" on the main gear 
    followed (almost immediately) by the nose gear.

    WRB

    -- 

    On Aug 18, 2010, at 18:47, [email protected] wrote:

    >
    >
    > I've heard this over and over but if that little cable isn't on the 
    > nose gear and your landing speed is a little hot, you will hit the 
    > nose gear first, because the nose gear hangs down lower,  and enter to 
    > what many is called a JC maneuver, as in "J-----s C------t!!!!!!!!!!!
    > It is also called a PIO, or pilot induced oscillation and is the 
    > primary reason a lot of Ercoupes have a bent firewall.  I say keep the 
    > cable and save the Ercoupe.
    > Bart
    >



  

Reply via email to