No, you can't blame that on metal wings, they don't add that much weight. 
Something else is going on. Are you sure your airspeed instrument is correct? I 
have metals wings and my approach speed is 70 to 75. Well actually I don't have 
any wings at this time as I have it apart for restoration.

Kevin1



--- In [email protected], "Jerry Ward" <mag45to...@...> wrote:
>
> I guess I have to respond to this one.. I am one of those people that have 
> been landing "Hot".  I have listened to many of you Couper's that claim you 
> land in the low 60's or at least below 70mph.  Well, I have had my Coupe for 
> a little over two years now and it is a metal wing 1950 G' Model and I can 
> tell you from much experience that landing this plane below 75 would result 
> in major repairs.  I usually touch down at around 78 to 85mph.  The plane 
> starts to sink at about 1200 ft per min. if you let it get slower than 75mph. 
>  And that is not what you want when you are 20 ft off the ground.  I know all 
> of you guys with the fabric wings can land slow - but when you add the weight 
> of metal it is a different story.  Jerry - leaving tomorrow for Kitty Hawk 
> from the Great Northwest.
> 
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: bbart...@... 
>   To: [email protected] 
>   Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:59 AM
>   Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] nose gear cable
> 
> 
>     
> 
>   Who's landing hot?  Notice from time to time, some people screw up the 
> flare - initiate it just a tad late - and allow the nose gear to touch first. 
>  The upward force of that premature nose gear touch rotates the airplane 
> around it's lateral axis and the mains touch with some flying speed and the 
> airplane becomes airborne.  The pilot, in an attempt to correct the bounce, 
> instinctively applies forward pressure on the yoke forcing another nose wheel 
> touch and the sequence repeats except this time with a bigger bounce.  
> Subsequent control inputs become a half cycle out of phase the and bounce 
> becomes more exaggerated.  That is a true JC maneuver (slang) or 
> "pilot-induced-oscillation" (PIO).  You haven't lived until you've been in 
> one of those.  I witnessed one in 1961 in a T-33 and we flew out of it.  
>   The corrective action, by the way, is to go around immediately.  If you 
> ride it out, you are either going to crash or at the least crunch the nose 
> gear and firewall.
>   Pants on the ground
>   Hat turned around
>   Bart
> 
>   In a message dated 8/18/2010 11:12:40 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
> ercog...@... writes:
> 
>     Just as the choice to smoke or not smoke is one each of us must make, 
>     there are good choices and bad choices.  I choose to presume people who 
>     wear their caps backward (that aren't welders) don't know any better, 
>     and I never vocalize that choice  ;<)
> 
>     The presence or absence of a snubber is of little consequence to a 
>     reasonably experienced Ercoupe pilot.  A level static sill is MUCH more 
>     important.  I do believe it a disadvantage to pilots new to the Ercoupe 
>     to have a snubber.
> 
>     Any pilot that repeatedly lands an Ercoupe "hot" either does not 
>     understand or does not demonstrate the proficiency of control necessary 
>     for predictable and safe operation(s).  The remedy is not a ten buck 
>     length of aircraft cable.  It is sufficient qualified instruction to 
>     thereafter predictably and repeated land an Ercoupe at or below 70 mph 
>     TIAS in any weather condition likely to be encountered.
> 
>     Presuming proper rigging and a stabilized approach, touchdown at up to 
>     90 mph should be uneventful...a "wheel landing" on the main gear 
>     followed (almost immediately) by the nose gear.
> 
>     WRB
> 
>     -- 
> 
>     On Aug 18, 2010, at 18:47, bbart...@... wrote:
> 
>     >
>     >
>     > I've heard this over and over but if that little cable isn't on the 
>     > nose gear and your landing speed is a little hot, you will hit the 
>     > nose gear first, because the nose gear hangs down lower,  and enter to 
>     > what many is called a JC maneuver, as in "J-----s C------t!!!!!!!!!!!
>     > It is also called a PIO, or pilot induced oscillation and is the 
>     > primary reason a lot of Ercoupes have a bent firewall.  I say keep the 
>     > cable and save the Ercoupe.
>     > Bart
>     >
>


Reply via email to