A lot of this is pilot technique. If you land with a high nose attitude you 
won't have as much problems as one who does not. The size of the nose tire and 
fork type also plays in here. Syd, as I recall you have a single fork and 4 
inch wheel? Call me a crappy pilot if you like but I have a duel fork and 5 
inch wheel and I don't tend to land in a very nose high attitude. I took my 
cable off about 25 years ago and after a couple landings put it back on and 
intend to keep it that way and have no problems with crosswind landings.

Kevin1

 

--- In [email protected], Syd Cohen <sydl...@...> wrote:
>
> Methinks not, Bart.  I've made over 6800 landings in my Coupe, some slow, 
> some fast, but most about 50 mph, and have never touched the nose gear first. 
>  All three tires extend about 12" lower when in flight compared to when the 
> plane is on the ground, not just the nose tire.  I removed my snubber cable 
> about 25 years ago.
> 
> Syd
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 18, 2010, at 9:19 PM, bbart...@... wrote:
> 
> > 
> > This is overanalyzing something very simple.  If you land hot, you are 
> > standing a good chance of the nose gear touching first. Leads to a PIO.   
> > In any airplane.  Especially in an Ercoupe with limited elevator up travel. 
> > Me thinks.
> > Bart
> >  
> > In a message dated 8/18/2010 9:02:26 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, e...@... 
> > writes:
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > On 2010-08-18 6:47 PM, bbart...@... wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >> 
> >> I've heard this over and over but if that little cable isn't on the nose 
> >> gear and your landing speed is a little hot, you will hit the nose gear 
> >> first, because the nose gear hangs down lower,  and enter to what many is 
> >> called a JC maneuver, as in "J-----s C------t!!!!!!!!!!!
> >> It is also called a PIO, or pilot induced oscillation and is the primary 
> >> reason a lot of Ercoupes have a bent firewall.  I say keep the cable and 
> >> save the Ercoupe.
> >> Bart
> > 
> > Bart,
> > 
> > (long, but useful I think - in four parts)
> > 
> > I've been around Coupes - and paying close attention - for most of 32 
> > years, now and I can say I've never heard that one.
> > 
> > Please let me elaborate.
> > 
> > If you land hot (or slow), even in a crab with no snubber cable and the 
> > nose gear hanging way down AS DESIGNED, then the nose gear will touch soon 
> > after the mains and before significant weight is on the mains.
> > 
> > No huhu!
> > 
> > The nose gear can turn.
> > 
> > That is, unless you are disregarding the Ercoupe piloting instructions 
> > which say you should hold the yoke lightly so the nose wheel is free to 
> > turn.
> > 
> > So, the side load on the nose wheel is instantly relieved.  The mains, 
> > being laterally fixed, cannot relieve their side loads except by turning 
> > the whole plane, AS DESIGNED.
> > 
> > It works.  I've done it over and over including in direct crosswinds up to 
> > 30 mph with never more than a 10 foot diversion from the runway center line.
> > 
> > If and only if you hold the yoke in a tight grip and don't allow it to 
> > jerk, then you can get a significant diversion from the runway center line.
> >  __________________________________
> > 
> > PIO, Pilot Induced Oscillation, is a term that can probably be applied to 
> > several flying situations.  The one that applies to landings is when the 
> > pilot fails to make a smooth flare from the final glide to the virtually 
> > horizontal flight just before touchdown.  Sometimes pilots, especially new 
> > or out-of-practice pilots will pull too hard on the yoke, flare nose high 
> > and getting slower, push too hard to get the nose down and find themselves 
> > heading nose down toward the runway and . . .    Sometimes they'll hit nose 
> > down after a single oscillation, sometimes they'll keep it in the air 
> > through a few oscillations but if they don't get it under control they may 
> > well hit the ground nose down, folding under the nose gear and bending the 
> > firewall.  
> > 
> > This has nothing to do with the snubber cable - except, if the snubber 
> > cable is present then the nose gear has much less of its designed shock 
> > absorption capability so an impact that might have been saved by the shock 
> > absorber could cause sever damage because the snubber cable is present.
> >  ___________________________________
> > 
> > Dave Winters makes an interesting point and I agree with Bill - I hadn't 
> > thought of the snubber cable that way, as an advantage on a rudder pedal 
> > equipped Coupe.  I have flown hundreds of hours in a rudder pedal Coupe 
> > with a snubber cable and I did do a LOT of side-slip, wing-low touchdowns, 
> > upwind main first, then downwind main then nose.  It may well be that the 
> > snubber cable helped make that u-main, d-main, nose sequence work out so 
> > well.  Well explained, Dave!  
> > 
> > (Side note:  At crosswind speeds above 15 mph crosswind component, I 
> > leveled the wings and landed like a 2-control Coupe.  There was enough 
> > rudder effectiveness to exactly counter a 15 mph direct crosswind but not 
> > more.  However, landing in a crab with wings level, the three control Coupe 
> > handles strong crosswinds just a nicely as does a 2-control Coupe.
> >  ___________________________________
> > 
> > The real J_____ C_____ maneuver with a Coupe is when you have a drooping 
> > tail.  In that case, the wings can be at enough of a positive angle of 
> > attack on the ground that a strong crosswind can lift a wing after the 
> > landing.  It can be so bad that the pilot may think he/she will touch the 
> > downwind wingtip (but that's extremely unlikely to happen due to the 
> > dihedral).  And, wheelbarrowing along on the nose and one main with a wing 
> > reaching for the sky is highly scary and likely to cause diversion off the 
> > runway into any obstacle within a hundred feet or more.
> > 
> > Thus, it is VERY valuable to have your main landing gear maintenance up to 
> > date and have your on-the-ground attitude very nearly level as measured by 
> > the datum, the windowsill.
> > 
> > When the Coupe is level in pitch on the ground, the wings have nearly zero 
> > angle of attack so they have virtually no lift and on the ground behavior 
> > is proper even with strong crosswinds.
> > 
> > Ed
> > 
> > 
> >
>


Reply via email to