Sounds good, except why not just submit patches directly to core? The erlang mode has now got patches from outside of the erlware-mode so they have already diverged.
dave On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Eric Merritt <[email protected]> wrote: > Guys, > > I am going to propose a few changes to erlware-mode (yes I know its going > away but changes seem to be feeding erlang mode). > > > 1. Lets change the generated documentation specs to the modern spec > syntax/placement > 2. Lets drop the redundant documentation in on the various gen_* skeletons. I > am coming to the conclusion that its more clutter then help. We should > encourage people to document their public api functions. > > 3. I would like to add place holders for a types area and generate > -export_type to encourage people to document and export their public types. > > These changes are pretty simple overall, but should increase the usability > quite a bit. I am willing to create the patches when I get time. > > Comments, feedback? > > Eric > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "erlware-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
