Eric?

I also have another suggestion. We should remove the

%%----

lines from infront of functions, either both or the one at the bottom.
Including the spec below that line seems odd to me. Thoughts?

On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Dave Peticolas <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's cool, but it will need a new maintainer :) I'm done with
> Emacs hacking for a while and I'm using the version from core
> now.
>
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Martin Logan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I like the idea of having the competing mode actually. A place where
>> new features are experimented with. The Erlang mode is naturally a
>> more conservative project.
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Dave Peticolas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Sounds good, except why not just submit patches directly to core?
>>>
>>> The erlang mode has now got patches from outside of the erlware-mode
>>> so they have already diverged.
>>>
>>> dave
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Eric Merritt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Guys,
>>>>
>>>>  I am going to propose a few changes to erlware-mode (yes I know its going 
>>>> away but changes seem to be feeding erlang mode).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1. Lets change the generated documentation specs to the modern spec 
>>>> syntax/placement
>>>> 2. Lets drop the redundant documentation in on the various gen_* 
>>>> skeletons. I am coming to the conclusion that its more clutter then help. 
>>>> We should encourage people to document their public api functions.
>>>>
>>>> 3. I would like to add place holders for a types area and generate 
>>>> -export_type to encourage people to document and export their public types.
>>>>
>>>> These changes are pretty simple overall, but should increase the usability 
>>>> quite a bit. I am willing to create the patches when I get time.
>>>>
>>>> Comments, feedback?
>>>>
>>>> Eric
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "erlware-dev" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "erlware-dev" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "erlware-dev" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "erlware-dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"erlware-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to