> No edoc still hasn't caught up. I am not to worried about that and don't > think we should let it hold us up. Edoc will catch up eventually (probably).
What I don't like is maintaining two different versions of the typing system, so I have to choose between having erlang types, but no types in the documentation, or having documented types and no erlang types (I vote for the first). Cheers -- Samuel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
