No edoc still hasn't caught up. I am not to worried about that and don't think we should let it hold us up. Edoc will catch up eventually (probably).
El Oct 11, 2010, a las 1:58 AM, Samuel escribió: >> 1. Lets change the generated documentation specs to the modern spec >> syntax/placement > > Are type declarations already integrated with edoc? Last time I > checked you still had to duplicate the effort if you wanted type > declarations and documentation... > >> 2. Lets drop the redundant documentation in on the various gen_* skeletons. >> I am coming to the conclusion that its more clutter then help. We should >> encourage people to document their public api functions. > > I'll vote for that, I never ever change that documentation, and I > doubt anyone does. > > Cheers > -- > Samuel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "erlware-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
