On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 00:40:51 -0400, Alex Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>What is the parts count on the last version of KISS? What is expected increase in
>count
>for next machine?
We don't track such things. Is there some compelling reason we
should?
>Why would a volunteer willing to do CAD for you put up with you telling them what to
>use?
They wouldn't; that's my point.
>You have had a couple of nibbles already, what are you waiting for?
Gosh, Alex, you're right. Hey, everybody, let's start using CAD!
...That's funny. It didn't work.
>I am saying as a person with many interests and who builds many projects that those
>that
>build things, with moderate pain could make the leap, and that it opens up whole new
>things for you, It's a BFH!
This, OTOH, I find persuasive. I always give "been there, done that,
here's how" more weight than, "you guys should try X."
>> (I should add that being consensus driven does not paralyze us,
>> because we're all interested in getting things done, and most work is
>> done by individuals or small teams.)
>
>If someone volunteers to do CAD for you do they have to wait for a consensus?
No; that qualifies as an individual working on his own. We have a lot
of that. But (and forgive me while I show my ignorance, but I have an
untested assumption here) doesn't a CAD part have to be built for the
CAD work to be useful?
-R
--
"Sutton is the beginning of wisdom -
but only the beginning."
-- Jeff Greason
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
