Was this rocket testing a constant pressure feed? Doug Jones wrote:
> Randall Clague wrote: > > > The chug frequency wasn't constant; we heard it changing pitch. > > That could be explained by doppler, since the vehicle approaches mach > one in just a few seconds, the chug rate would appear to drop even if it > were constant. > > > I think for reduction purposes we can assume the relationship between > > the sampling frequency and the oscillation frequency is variable. > > Given that assumption, aren't the amplitudes pretty much the same over > > a ~100 msec time scale? > > That makes sense, it's highly unlikely that higher frequency components > would be exactly in synch with the sample rate. > > Doug > > _______________________________________________ > ERPS-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>----<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ........ Alex Fraser N3DER ......... ......... [EMAIL PROTECTED] ....... [~]_>^</\-[~]_>^</\-[~]_>^</\-[~]_>^< _______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
