On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:19:18 -0800, David Weinshenker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Randall Clague wrote:
>> The clock is running. We need to get hot on POGO. That
>> may mean putting Spike on the back burner next year.
>
>Hmmm... that's a good question whether it will or not: what
>conflicts exist between the two projects that would interfere
>with their simultaneous progress?
None that I'm aware of. It is harder to keep momentum on two projects
at the same time, but I think we can do it. What I want to do is
formally establish POGO as our first priority, so that if there is
competition between POGO and Spike, POGO comes first.
-R
--
"Is this a bagel?"
"It's the Guardian of Forever!"
"Well yes. But is it a bagel?"
--Overheard at Loscon 29
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
