On 20 Dec 2002 10:37:26 -0800, David Masten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I believe we can fly POGO by then. I am not sure we can fly any form of
>Conrad square by then.
OK. Let's find out. :-)
>- Peroxide supply. Purification processes are looking promising but some
>serious work still needs to be done to meet the peroxide demand of POGO.
This is also an area where POGO and Spike will compete.
>- Smooth engine performance. We need a better feel for what is wrong
>with the KISS engine so that we can avoid the problem in POGO.
I'm confident we can solve that problem in plenty of time.
>There is no reason for halting Spike development.
Not yet, anyway. Peroxide supply may force the issue. It would be
great if it didn't.
If peroxide supply were not a problem, do we have the vehicles to take
both Spike and POGO to MTA?
Another issue is that we need to be able to fly at MTA more than once
a month, which means joining RRS. I don't see this as a serious
problem.
-R
--
"Is this a bagel?"
"It's the Guardian of Forever!"
"Well yes. But is it a bagel?"
--Overheard at Loscon 29
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
