On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 11:18:39 -0500, Andrew Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Interesting that the major hazard to people on the ground appears to be >OMS propellants. Yet another data point in favor of non-toxics. Ah, yes, thanks. I got disheartened when locals reported injuries due to poking around in the debris. There's always that 10%, and any expected casualty analysis has to account for them (and probably at 100%, to be conservative). But non-toxic propellants would indeed solve that problem. Thanks. -R _______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
