you just want to build the satellite delivery system ;->

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Weinshenker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: [ERPS] FYI: Final Columbia Accident Report


> Randall Clague wrote:
> > "Gotten their act together" is a bit strong.  I think "been absolutely
> > right on the ball" is a better description of what would have been
> > necessary.  The main point, that there was initially a chance to save
> > the crew, is valid.
> 
> One thing that NASA probably ought to do is develop a cheap, 
> fast-launch Orbital Lifetime Extension Package - a pod filled
> with stuff like extra oxygen, CO2 absorbent, food, and toilet 
> paper, carrying enough OMS delta-V for final rendezvous, and 
> capable of being launched, in multiples, within a few days notice, 
> on an ICBM-class booster. (How does the throw-weight of, say,
> the Minuteman system compare to the original Atlas, which was
> used to orbit the 3000-lb Mercury spacecraft?)
>  
> Absolute unit reliability is not as critical if the package is made
> manufacturable - if it takes a few tries to connect, the one that gets
> there makes it all worthwhile in giving the crew of a potentially damaged
> shuttle some etxra days or weeks of survival on orbit while a definitive
> rescue is contrived. (This has been discussed here before, and though it
> wasn't included in the report as a recommendation, I think it should have
> been.)
> 
> -dave w
> _______________________________________________
> ERPS-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list

Reply via email to