On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 13:47:50 -0700, "Tony Fredericks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Randall Clague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Less work to just send every subsequent Shuttle flight to ISS. There, >>it can be inspected, and if found to be unsafe for reentry, the ISS >>crew just got bigger. Ramp up the Progress and Soyuz pipeline, try to >>bring the Shuttle back unmanned, and when it crashes take that as the >>cue to retire the bloody thing. > >Except the Columbia was in an orbit where they were unable to reach the ISS. Note the use of the word "subsequent." Columbia will not be making any subsequent missions... -R -- Son: Dad, I have a question about women. Suppose I Dagwood: Apologize anyway. Son: Yeah, that's about what I figured Dagwood: It saves time _______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
