On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 02:08:11PM -0700, Michael Wallis wrote: > Jim Richardson wrote: > > > The report said someone pulled the bolts, but failed to document it, and > > the procedure for rotation wasn't followed (checking said bolts) Sounds > > like either a process failure, or a failure to follow the process. > > Or both. Sounds like the "well they're not using these" met the "It's > always worked before" schools of process control. >
Sounds about right. > And why, for a vehicle that won't be launched for 5 years, were they > using pressurized tanks?? > To keep their shape? -- Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock Linux, because eventually, you grow up enough to be trusted with a fork() _______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
