On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 09:34, Andrew Case wrote:
> True. I was just pointing out that the clarification is nice to have.
> On reflection it's not really a big deal, since nothing has changed.
> FAR 101.1 kills the idea, since it's explicit about the rocket being
> unmanned.
Not if the vehicle in question can be licensed to fly under the
experimental a/c regulations. BTB, this could possibly also extend to
VTVLs, due to the existence of the Powered Lift Normal category that
Moller got in a few years back.
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
