On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I like those definitions. Even though I just changed it I would now go > back to calling them methods rather than functions (because this is bound > when the functions are invoked). Also we lost the "is" before "read" in the > [[Getter]] definition. So, the final form would be: > > [[Getter]] A zero-argument method called to produce the property value each > time the property is read. > > [[Setter]] A one-argument method called with the assigned value each time > the property is assigned. The effect of a property's [[Setter]] method may, > but is not required to, affect the value produced by subsequent calls to the > property's [[Getter]] method.
Looks good to me. Now what happens. Do you add this to a ticket somewhere? Peter _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
