I'll make sure Pratap edits it into the working draft. I intend to propose at the Kona meeting that we have reached a point where we need to move to a strict ticket driven process for the ES3.1 endgame. Hopefully, we can just adopt and start using the "ES4" Trac server
>-----Original Message----- >From: Peter Michaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 11:42 AM >To: Allen Wirfs-Brock >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: Kona [[Getter]] and [[Setter]] descriptions > >On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> OK, I like those definitions. Even though I just changed it I would >now go back to calling them methods rather than functions (because this >is bound when the functions are invoked). Also we lost the "is" before >"read" in the [[Getter]] definition. So, the final form would be: >> >> [[Getter]] A zero-argument method called to produce the property >value each time the property is read. >> >> [[Setter]] A one-argument method called with the assigned value each >time the property is assigned. The effect of a property's [[Setter]] >method may, but is not required to, affect the value produced by >subsequent calls to the property's [[Getter]] method. > >Looks good to me. Now what happens. Do you add this to a ticket >somewhere? > >Peter _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
