On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock
<allen.wirfs-br...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Conforming consensus...
>
> I want to make sure that I understand the consensus of last week's discussion
> on this thread so I can update the spec. accordingly. Below is the decision
> points that I sent out last week. I've annotated it with what I believe was
> the consensus of the discussion. Let me know if anybody disagrees that this
> is actually the consensus conclusions.
> [...]
I agree with all the decisions above.
> In addition of code units in the range 0x0000-0x001f JSON.stringify inserts
> escape sequences into string literals for some or all of the following code
> units:
> 0x007f-0x009f, 0x00ad,
> 0x0600-0x0604,0x070f,0x17bf,0x17b5,0x200c-0x200f,0x2028-0x202f,0x2060-0x206f,0xfeff,0xfff0-0xffff
>
> Was there any consensus that at least some of these code points should be
> escapeded? If show which if not all?
I think it is important that 0x2028 and 0x2029 be escaped. I have no
opinion about the others.
--
Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain
Cheers,
--MarkM
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
