glad somebody said that! Also I would pollute performance oriented methods rather than "whatever framework sugar" anybody could easily add where unique() and remove(all) may be part of these cases while fill() could be superfluous.
Andrea On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Jul 10, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Dmitry A. Soshnikov wrote: > > > And by the way, an efficient `Array.prototype.unique` also would be nice > to have, since in JS in general it's hard to implement it's efficiently (in > lower level at least it will iterate faster). > > > > [1, 3, 2, 5, 5, 3].unique(); // [1, 3, 2, 5] > > Before considering adding too many things to Array.prototype we perhaps > should start considering the protocol of a real collection hierarchy that > goes beyond just arrays. > > Allen > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
