On Sep 30, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: >> and if it were added i see no reason to restrict it solely "constructors". >> That said I don't like the syntax at all :D > > What, if any, syntax for avoiding repeating each member name three times, do > you prefer?
Personally I don't spend my entire life writing constructors so the committees obsession with reducing the token count in a constructor still confuses me. Most code is not constructors. --Oliver > > /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
