On Sep 30, 2011, at 9:39 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote: > On Sep 30, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: >>> and if it were added i see no reason to restrict it solely "constructors". >>> That said I don't like the syntax at all :D >> >> What, if any, syntax for avoiding repeating each member name three times, do >> you prefer? > > Personally I don't spend my entire life writing constructors so the > committees obsession with reducing the token count in a constructor still > confuses me.
No one is obsessed. We're trying not to suck by comparison to languages ranging from CoffeeScript to Scala, 'sall. > Most code is not constructors. Yeah, so? We can generalize for all methods as you suggested, but I somehow doubt that was your point. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
