Thanks - This looks really nice!
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]>wrote: > with corrected link to wiki page: > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:proto_operator#suggestion_to_replace_with > > > On Mar 2, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote: > > It was recently suggested to me that it is unlikely that we will ever > adopt -> as as function expression shorthand symbol and that this means we > could consider using that symbol sequence for other purposes. In > particular, it would be a reasonable and possibly less controversial > alternative to the <| symbol. I would have no objection to that switch and > have written the suggestion up at > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:proto_operator#suggestion_to_replace_with > > > Some examples of this usage of -> include: > > MyObject.prototype -> {a:1,b:2} > > appArrayBehavior->[0,1,2,3,4,5] > > let subclass = superclass -> function () {}; > > var p = newRegExpMethods -> /[a-m][3-7]/ > > > What do you think? Do you like -> better than <| ? Is it ok to not have > it available for some possible future function shorthand? > > Allen > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
