with corrected link to wiki page: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:proto_operator#suggestion_to_replace_with
On Mar 2, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote: It was recently suggested to me that it is unlikely that we will ever adopt -> as as function expression shorthand symbol and that this means we could consider using that symbol sequence for other purposes. In particular, it would be a reasonable and possibly less controversial alternative to the <| symbol. I would have no objection to that switch and have written the suggestion up at http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:proto_operator#suggestion_to_replace_with Some examples of this usage of -> include: MyObject.prototype -> {a:1,b:2} appArrayBehavior->[0,1,2,3,4,5] let subclass = superclass -> function () {}; var p = newRegExpMethods -> /[a-m][3-7]/ What do you think? Do you like -> better than <| ? Is it ok to not have it available for some possible future function shorthand? Allen _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
