> > > > 6) Do arrow functions need to have per instance "caller" and "arguments" > poison pill properties? > > > > I propose no, because they are a new feature. But we can include a NOTE > warning against providing their non-standard legacy implementation. > > For simplicity and uniformity, I'd keep the same semantics as for > ordinary functions. Don't special-case if there is no strong reason to > do so.
Can arrow functions just not have arguments, caller, and name at all? I have to say, it's really annoying having to special case these properties when trying to create function proxies that are mostly virtual, as they are non-configurable, non-writable, and own properties.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
