I agree with Rick on the general feeling with Array.of If arguing ambiguity I would argue a better method name for type guarded arrays would be Array.ofType
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.r...@gmail.com>wrote: > > On Sunday, August 26, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: > > Rick Waldron wrote: > > But Array.of is not. Maybe Array.new is a good name. > > Array.of is unambiguous with the current ES specification > > > Array.new is ok too, though -- no problem with a reserved identifier as > a property name. It's darn nice for Rubyists. > > OTOH Array.of matches the preposition pattern used in Array.from. But I > don't think this trumps Array.new. > > > Nor do I, but I think it poses a problem for polyfilling (which is not a > silver bullet). > > +1 Array.new, but I still think Array.of sounds, feels and looks nicer > > Rick > > Cc'ing Dave for his thoughts. > > /be > > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
