Kevin Smith wrote:
Isn't there a name that we already use for alternative constructors:
create?
let object = Object.create(null);
let array = Array.create("A", "B", "C");
If only create weren't used for Object.create, which takes a pdmap as
second parameter. That is a complicated beast, with the wrong defaults
for writable configurable and arguably enumerable.
The Ruby precedent for Array.new appeals to me (and I'm not a Rubyist).
I could live with Array.of but even ignoring search-engine usability,
using a preposition for a constructor name, rather than a verb or a
verb'ed adjective, counts against it a tiny bit IMHO.
/be
Kevin
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
