On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Rick Waldron <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think that screenshots of search suggestions for a language feature > that hasn't even been published is valid argument in this discussion. > > I'd also argue that these results support the current Array.of definition, > eg. > > "I need to make an array of strings": > > Array.of( "A", "B", "C", "D" ); > > ...Which returns an array of strings. Any example works, Array.of( things
You may miss that, only suggestions in English version of Bing have many "-s". That means, most non-English (At least Chinese as my screenshots) programmers won't think like that. BTW, my Class.of(Type) choice come from VB.NET which use Class (of Type) to denote generics. > ... ) nicely describes what the function can be expected to do. As I noted > earlier, I'm not opposed to Array.new(), but I maintain the position that it > reads like backwards computer speak. Maybe it like computer speak for native English speakers, but for me and many programmers from non-English world, Array.new is much more intuitive than Array.of . Thank you. -- hax _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
