On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Domenic Denicola < > dome...@domenicdenicola.com> wrote: > >> From: Rick Waldron [waldron.r...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 16:52 >> >> > No iteration for spread, per July 24 resolution >> https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2012-July/024207.html >> >> Oh, thanks for catching me on that. Silly Firefox... >> >> This seems like an unfortunate decision, and I couldn't discern the >> motivation in the minutes. When would I want to use a syntax that fails for >> iterables? Does [...x] throw for an iterable, or result in something else? >> > > The direct reasoning for the resolution was: > > "Cannot be both iterable and array-like" > > It's possible that this could be added to the agenda for november, if > Brendan wants to discuss SpiderMonkey's experience implementing it. It > seems to me that if they're not having issues then it's at least worth a > mention. > Please do. I'd really like to see a more pleasant resolution if one can be found. What does SpiderMonkey actually do? > > Rick > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
