On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Jussi Kalliokoski < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Andreas Rossberg <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 3 October 2012 05:38, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Which is more important, iterating over holes (preserved if possible), >> or >> > skipping them and therefore spreading array-likes but not iterables? >> >> I, for one, couldn't care less about holes. We shouldn't compromise >> any useful feature just for the sake of preserving some array hole >> craziness. >> > > I agree. Unless there's a sane use case for holes with the spread > operator, I don't think it makes sense to make compromises because of them, > especially since we aren't breaking backwards compatibility or anything. We > can actually make something better here. > I seem to remember an issue re: what to do with infinite iterators (generators)? If that's correct, was there an agreed-upon resolution?
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
