From: Rick Waldron [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2012 17:18
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Domenic Denicola > <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Rick Waldron [[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 16:52 > > > No iteration for spread, per July 24 resolution > > > https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2012-July/024207.html > > Oh, thanks for catching me on that. Silly Firefox... > > This seems like an unfortunate decision, and I couldn't discern the > > motivation in the minutes. When would I want to use a syntax that fails for > > iterables? Does [...x] throw for an iterable, or result in something else? > The direct reasoning for the resolution was: > "Cannot be both iterable and array-like" I can't really understand what this is trying to say. It must be because I don't understand "iterable". Doesn't it just mean "responds to for-of"? I would imagine arrays, NodeLists, arguments, and other array-likes all respond to for-of; if they don't, that seriously decreases the utility of for-of! > It's possible that this could be added to the agenda for november, if Brendan > wants to discuss SpiderMonkey's experience implementing it. It seems to me > that if they're not having issues then it's at least worth a mention. Yay! _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
