On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Andreas Rossberg <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 3 October 2012 05:38, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > > Which is more important, iterating over holes (preserved if possible), or > > skipping them and therefore spreading array-likes but not iterables? > > I, for one, couldn't care less about holes. We shouldn't compromise > any useful feature just for the sake of preserving some array hole > craziness. > I agree. Unless there's a sane use case for holes with the spread operator, I don't think it makes sense to make compromises because of them, especially since we aren't breaking backwards compatibility or anything. We can actually make something better here. Cheers, Jussi
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
