On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < [email protected]> wrote:
> yes, I should have checked the specs but that page should be either > updated or removed. > No, you should just read the spec and if you find yourself at the page you linked to, in big bold letters at the top: *This proposal has progressed to the Draft ECMAScript 6 Specification, which is available for review here: specification_drafts<http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:specification_drafts>. Any new issues relating to them should be filed as bugs at http://bugs.ecmascript.org* > Anyway you still didn't convince me generators were needed at all there, > neither that I can "simply shim iterators" 'cause this makes generators > pointless in first place if it was so easy to polyfill ... which is not. > > The polyfill gonna grow in size for no concrete reason now, can I at least > ask if current specs about Maps, Sets, and WeakMaps are final? > Polyfills don't decide the fate of the future. Rick
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
