On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < [email protected]> wrote:
> The proposal in this page is outdated and the formal one has progressed to > ... etc etc ... > I've updated every relevant page with some further clarifying language. Hopefully it's sufficient. Rick > > but hey, I am not the English mother tongue here, I just got confused by > "this proposal". > > I refer to the current one showed/discussed/described usually, but maybe > it's just me so if you think that's "unmistakenable" fine, I've learned > some better english today too. > > regards > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Rick Waldron <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Rick, that big bold thing is what mislead to me ... *This proposal* >>> I thought was referred to the page, the one showed in that page ... >>> >> >> Would you like me to add some additional text so that it's clearer? >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Rick Waldron <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> yes, I should have checked the specs but that page should be either >>>>> updated or removed. >>>>> >>>> >>>> No, you should just read the spec and if you find yourself at the page >>>> you linked to, in big bold letters at the top: >>>> >>>> *This proposal has progressed to the Draft ECMAScript 6 Specification, >>>> which is available for review here: >>>> specification_drafts<http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:specification_drafts>. >>>> Any new issues relating to them should be filed as bugs at >>>> http://bugs.ecmascript.org* >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Anyway you still didn't convince me generators were needed at all >>>>> there, neither that I can "simply shim iterators" 'cause this makes >>>>> generators pointless in first place if it was so easy to polyfill ... >>>>> which >>>>> is not. >>>>> >>>>> The polyfill gonna grow in size for no concrete reason now, can I at >>>>> least ask if current specs about Maps, Sets, and WeakMaps are final? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Polyfills don't decide the fate of the future. >>>> >>>> >>>> Rick >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
