thank you
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Rick Waldron <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> The proposal in this page is outdated and the formal one has progressed >> to ... etc etc ... >> > > I've updated every relevant page with some further clarifying language. > Hopefully it's sufficient. > > Rick > > >> >> but hey, I am not the English mother tongue here, I just got confused by >> "this proposal". >> >> I refer to the current one showed/discussed/described usually, but maybe >> it's just me so if you think that's "unmistakenable" fine, I've learned >> some better english today too. >> >> regards >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Rick Waldron <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Rick, that big bold thing is what mislead to me ... *This proposal* >>>> I thought was referred to the page, the one showed in that page ... >>>> >>> >>> Would you like me to add some additional text so that it's clearer? >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Rick Waldron >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> yes, I should have checked the specs but that page should be either >>>>>> updated or removed. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No, you should just read the spec and if you find yourself at the page >>>>> you linked to, in big bold letters at the top: >>>>> >>>>> *This proposal has progressed to the Draft ECMAScript 6 >>>>> Specification, which is available for review here: >>>>> specification_drafts<http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:specification_drafts>. >>>>> Any new issues relating to them should be filed as bugs at >>>>> http://bugs.ecmascript.org* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Anyway you still didn't convince me generators were needed at all >>>>>> there, neither that I can "simply shim iterators" 'cause this makes >>>>>> generators pointless in first place if it was so easy to polyfill ... >>>>>> which >>>>>> is not. >>>>>> >>>>>> The polyfill gonna grow in size for no concrete reason now, can I at >>>>>> least ask if current specs about Maps, Sets, and WeakMaps are final? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Polyfills don't decide the fate of the future. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Rick >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
