Many times I wish there was Existential Operator, so here is my comment when we reconsider it in the future...
On 20 May 2014 12:36, Brendan Eich <bren...@mozilla.org> wrote: > WH: What about other contexts such as p?[x], p?.q[x], and p?(x) ? [Note that > grammar problems arise for some of those.] p?[x] and p?(x) are confusing with ?: ternary operator so instead p?.[x] and p?.(x) may be better to avoid that confusion. cheers Biju _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
