Claude Pache wrote:
Le 23 mai 2014 à 03:04, Brendan Eich<[email protected]> a écrit :
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
I've written a lot of coffeescript code and the existential operator is indeed
one of the joys of the language. I like David's
You mean Claude's?
/be
I must confess to have asked myself the same question at first reading :-p But
see the message of Axel posted a few hours ago in this thread.
Where Axel wrote
> David seems to suggest a compositional version: `o?.p?.q?.r`
I see a different problem: so heavyweight that many people will say it
isn't worth the cost of standardizing, and what about the `?(` form in
CoffeeScript?
/be
—Claude
attempt to bring rigor and compositionality to it.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
