On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Mark S. Miller <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Anne, I didn't understand the answer. When an old browser that knows > > nothing of <module> specifically sees "<table><module></table>", does it > > consider the <module> to be closed when it sees the </table> ? This also > > raises the question: Does such an old browser consider the <table> to be > > closed by this occurrence of </table>? > > Yes and yes. I recommend playing with > http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/ if you do not > want to read the algorithm in the specification. The tree it generates > might surprise you. Be sure to switch out <module> with <script> for > differences ;-) > To be clear, you're referring to the automatic placement of <module> as a descendant of BODY even if it's explicitly written inside <head></head> (but not for <script>)? Rick
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
