Thanks, and thanks to Hixie for that playground. I can't see us adopting parsing rules for a new tag that results in different structure for the rest of the page on old vs new browsers. Otherwise we just invite a whole new category of injection attacks.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Mark S. Miller <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Anne, I didn't understand the answer. When an old browser that knows > > nothing of <module> specifically sees "<table><module></table>", does it > > consider the <module> to be closed when it sees the </table> ? This also > > raises the question: Does such an old browser consider the <table> to be > > closed by this occurrence of </table>? > > Yes and yes. I recommend playing with > http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/ if you do not > want to read the algorithm in the specification. The tree it generates > might surprise you. Be sure to switch out <module> with <script> for > differences ;-) > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
