On Feb 26, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote: > For most of these, my first reaction is meh. They all make sense and violate > no principle, but are they worth it? > > I do not like the arrow function behavior. For anything named > function.something occurring within an arrow function, I'd expect it to be > about the lexically enclosing non-arrow function. I do not object to the idea > that there be such a special form that is about the arrow function, but it > needs to be spelled differently. I have no concrete suggestion though.
We have to work with the reserved words we have available, there really need to apply equivalently to all functions, arrow or otherwise defined. The only other available keyword that seems at all suggest of these use cases is 'in' in.callee (or whatever) in.count. in.arguments If we went that route I'd probably still stick with 'function.next' for that use case Allen _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
