> Le 27 févr. 2015 à 02:04, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
>
> On Feb 26, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
>> For most of these, my first reaction is meh. They all make sense and violate
>> no principle, but are they worth it?
>>
>> I do not like the arrow function behavior. For anything named
>> function.something occurring within an arrow function, I'd expect it to be
>> about the lexically enclosing non-arrow function. I do not object to the
>> idea that there be such a special form that is about the arrow function, but
>> it needs to be spelled differently. I have no concrete suggestion though.
>
> We have to work with the reserved words we have available, there really need
> to apply equivalently to all functions, arrow or otherwise defined. The only
> other available keyword that seems at all suggest of these use cases is 'in'
>
> in.callee (or whatever)
> in.count.
> in.arguments
>
> If we went that route I'd probably still stick with 'function.next' for that
> use case
>
> Allen
That one has just popped in my mind :-)
=>.arguments
—Claude
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
