1. `foo?.3:.5` should be unambiguously `foo ? 0.3 : 0.5`, because `3` is a number, not an identifier. `foo?.3` in any other context should be a syntax error. It's also inconsistent with array access otherwise. 2. I wouldn't have a problem with `object?.[prop]`, since that's only one character more. It's still a lot easier.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, 18:00 Claude Pache <claude.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Le 29 oct. 2015 à 21:04, Waldemar Horwat <walde...@google.com> a écrit > : > >> > >> On 10/29/2015 12:19, Laurentiu Macovei wrote: > >> `foo?.bar` and `foo?['bar']` syntax would work too. > > > > No. It would break existing code: > > > > x = foo?.3:.5; > > That could be resolved by a simple lookahead, I think. > > > > x = foo?[a]:[b]; > > That one is more problematic. IIRC, it was once suggested to use`?.[` > instead. > > —Claude > > > > > On the other hand, turning .. into a token should be fine. > > > > Waldemar > > > > _______________________________________________ > > es-discuss mailing list > > es-discuss@mozilla.org > > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
