It's visually ambiguous. I'd rather not read `1..toString()` and `foo..bar` in the same file. Not with greatly differing meanings.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, 19:29 Claude Pache <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Le 30 oct. 2015 à 00:07, Waldemar Horwat <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > >> On 10/29/2015 14:20, Claude Pache wrote: > > > >> In some cases – as in `3..toStrign()` –, `undefined` will be produced > where an error was thrown. > > > > > > No, this would continue to throw an error. > > Oops, you're right. So, `..` is 100% backward-compatible. > > —Claude > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
