Would break the web.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Ron Waldon <jokeyrh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Once upon a time, there was a fascinating proposal on this subject:
> - https://github.com/sebmarkbage/ecmascript-undefined-propagation
> Rather than introduce new syntax, Sebastian's proposal was to
> automatically propagate `undefined` values: if we're about to throw a
> dot-property-access-on-undefined error, we just return `undefined`
> I could find much discussion about this here, but I did find lots of
> discussions about approaches involving alternative syntax.
> es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss mailing list