Would break the web. On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Ron Waldon <jokeyrh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Once upon a time, there was a fascinating proposal on this subject: > - https://github.com/sebmarkbage/ecmascript-undefined-propagation > > Rather than introduce new syntax, Sebastian's proposal was to > automatically propagate `undefined` values: if we're about to throw a > dot-property-access-on-undefined error, we just return `undefined` > instead. > > I could find much discussion about this here, but I did find lots of > discussions about approaches involving alternative syntax. > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
