IIRC the proposed syntax for computed properties was `x?.[y]`, to avoid the ambiguity.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016, 10:24 Kagami Rosylight <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >The token ?. works fine > > > > I think more than half of this thread is about syntactic ambiguity, > regardless of whether the ambiguity is real or not. For example, from [an > earlier post of this thread]( > https://esdiscuss.org/topic/existential-operator-null-propagation-operator#content-44 > ): > > > > >But what should be done with cases like obj?[1]?[2]:[3]. > > > > A formatter may help this and make it `obj?[1] ? [2] : [3]` or `obj ? > [1]?[2] : [3]` depending on operator precedence, but shouldn’t it be more > clear? `obj![1]?[2]:[3]` will not be confused with ternary operator. > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
